![last person executed for espionage in the us last person executed for espionage in the us](https://api.army.mil/e2/c/-images/2011/05/02/107200/size0-full-army.mil-107200-2011-05-02-130538.jpg)
In today’s market, more and more companies seem to be turning to the dark area of industrial espionage. For years, corporations have gathered information on products, pricing, research, and corporate strategies from media reports, public financial statements, and other open-source research materials. Clearly, protecting research and development information and trade secrets continues to be a significant problem. In early 2018, private security experts reported that American businesses lose US$160–US$480 billion annually due to trade secret misappropriation. Director of the FBI Louis Freeh noted that the cost to US business for all types of espionage was more than US$100 billion annually. An employee most often accomplished the thefts. In 1994, the FBI reported that its economic counterintelligence unit had information that nearly 50% of research and development firms had a trade secret theft, and 57% reported repeat or multiple thefts. By 2015, research and development spending reached an all-time high of US$499 billion. “It’s a fact, if you snooze you lose.” “Competitive Intelligence is your best alarm clock.” īy 2010, research and development investment in the United States had more than doubled to nearly US$380 billion, or 2.62% of nominal GDP. The following information from a 2001 Business Week publication illustrates the point well: companies that engage in corporate spying see a payoff in increased revenue, costs avoided, and better decision-making.
![last person executed for espionage in the us last person executed for espionage in the us](https://images.indianexpress.com/2015/01/al-shabaab-fighters.jpg)
This ranges from analyzing publicity documents to schmoozing representatives to research securities filings and news reports. Competitive intelligence (which if not properly conducted can also be a form of industrial espionage) involves legal means of data collection. Still, the issue of what constitutes espionage can be gray. The spy’s tools may have transitioned to the computer and other sophisticated technology, but many of the people are previous Cold War participants, now working for private firms. However, the reality is somewhat different but in a world of increasing corporate competition and computer-based data storage, the problem of espionage is increasing. Government spies, typified by James Bond, working in glamorous settings, retrieve government secrets. Walters, in Introduction to Security (Tenth Edition), 2019 EspionageĮspionage usually brings about thoughts of spies sneaking into a company’s private vaults and copying or stealing formulas or products. In June 1953, Ethel Rosenberg was famously executed for espionage, along with her husband, Julius.Robert J. Heady and her boyfriend had kidnapped the 6-year-old son of a wealthy Kansas City couple and killed the boy before collecting the ransom. government was Bonnie Brown Heady, on Dec. Meanwhile, the attorneys hope Trump will read their clemency petition in order to understand that Montgomery’s case is like those of 16 other women who committed similar crimes but, Babcock said, “not a single woman is currently facing the death penalty.” We will be fighting as hard as possible to prevent this execution from taking place,” said one of the lawyers, Sandra Babcock. “We have legal avenues that remain open to us. The attorneys said they intend to take the execution rescheduling case to the Supreme Court. Court of Appeals rejected her attorneys’ claim that the rescheduling of the date was done illegally. She will be the 11th person put to death since July 14, when the federal government resumed executions after a 16-year break.Įarly this month, the U.S. The execution was temporarily blocked after her attorneys contracted the coronavirus visiting her in prison.
![last person executed for espionage in the us last person executed for espionage in the us](http://i1.ytimg.com/vi/3iBySGms-t0/hqdefault.jpg)
Montgomery originally was scheduled to be put to death on Dec. Hours later, after the victim’s bloody body had been found by her horrified mother, Montgomery called her husband to pick her up in the parking lot of a Long John Silver’s in Topeka, Kansas, telling him she had delivered the baby earlier in the day at a birthing center.Īfter the baby was found, she was returned to her father, Zeb Stinnett. Under the guise of buying a puppy from Stinnett, Montgomery set up a meeting and drove 170 miles to the younger woman’s home in Skidmore, Missouri. Montgomery turned her focus on Stinnett, 23, whom she had met through their shared interest in breeding rat terriers. Montgomery, who was then 36, had had a tubal ligation and so could not conceive. Montgomery needed to produce a baby quickly, they said, because her ex-husband, who was seeking custody of two of her children, planned to reveal that she was lying about being pregnant. Prosecutors characterized the crime as part of a calculated scheme.